Back to Resources

Advisor Summary: MoneyGuidePro’s market share dropped from 33% in 2024 to 24.23% in 2026, according to T3/Inside Information survey data, and in 2026 it lost the #1 position it had held for 17 consecutive years. Advisors are leaving primarily due to stagnant development, a buggy 2023 upgrade, and declining satisfaction scores (7.62/10, lowest among major platforms). If you are considering a switch, the main alternatives are RightCapital (fastest-growing, best value), eMoney (deepest comprehensive planning), and Income Lab (a full retirement planning platform and the primary pick for retirement-focused practices). This guide covers the reasons advisors leave, what to evaluate in a replacement, a comparison of the leading alternatives, and a step-by-step migration checklist.

In 2024, MoneyGuidePro held 33% market share in financial planning software. In the 2026 T3 survey, it holds 24.23%, and its 17-year run as the #1 planning platform is over. That is a nearly 9-point drop in two years, in a market where share changes of 2-3 points per year are considered dramatic.

Something is happening, and if you are reading this, you are probably part of it.

This guide is not a sales pitch for any specific platform. It is a practical resource for advisors evaluating their options after deciding that MoneyGuidePro no longer fits their practice. We will cover why advisors are leaving, what to look for in a replacement, how the major alternatives compare, and how to migrate without disrupting your client relationships.

Table of Contents

Why Advisors Are Leaving MoneyGuidePro

The exodus from MoneyGuidePro is not driven by a single issue. It is a combination of factors that accumulated over several years.

The 2023 upgrade debacle

In mid-2023, Envestnet rolled out a major MoneyGuidePro upgrade that introduced widespread bugs. The backlash was significant enough that Envestnet recalled the upgrade and reverted users to the legacy version. For many advisors, this was the moment trust broke. If your primary planning tool can’t ship a stable update, what does that say about the engineering organization behind it?

Source: RIABiz: Envestnet Recalls Buggy MoneyGuidePro Upgrade

Stagnant product development

MoneyGuidePro’s satisfaction score in the T3 survey dropped from 7.9 in 2024 to 7.62 in the 2026 survey, the lowest among major planning platforms. RightCapital, by contrast, scores 8.40 and ships quarterly feature updates. Advisors are not just evaluating features; they are evaluating trajectory. A platform that stopped improving is a platform you will eventually leave.

Support frustrations

The Kitces 2025 Report gives MoneyGuidePro a 7.8 support score, compared to RightCapital’s 9.1. One advisor’s feedback captures the sentiment: “When we went to MoneyGuide with problems, we got a ‘we’ve got bigger fish to fry’ message.” Whether or not that is representative of every interaction, it reflects a perception problem.

Price relative to value

MoneyGuide’s base tier starts at $2,000/year ($175/month). The full platform bundle with Wealth Studios runs $3,000/year ($258/month). Add-ons like Dash ($500/year), MyBlocks ($600/year), and account aggregation ($400/year) push the total higher. Advisors comparing these prices against RightCapital’s $150-255/month (with more features included at each tier) see a value gap that is hard to justify.

The Envestnet factor

Envestnet acquired MoneyGuide in 2019 for roughly $500M. Since then, MoneyGuide’s identity has been absorbed into the broader Envestnet ecosystem. Some advisors feel the product now serves Envestnet’s platform strategy more than it serves individual advisors. Product decisions that prioritize enterprise distribution over independent advisor needs reinforce this perception.

Advisor takeaway: If you are leaving MoneyGuidePro, you are not alone and you are not early. The market share data tells a clear story. The practical question is not whether to leave but where to go and how to transition without disrupting your practice.

What to Look for in a Replacement

Before comparing platforms, clarify what your practice actually needs. The biggest mistake advisors make when switching is replacing one comprehensive platform with another comprehensive platform that is as similar as possible, without asking whether they needed all those features in the first place. When replacing software, you may also be well-served to take stock of the state of the art in the industry. Many MoneyGuide users spent years or decades on the platform. A lot has changed in that time!

Questions to answer first

  1. What percentage of your clients are in or near retirement? If it is above 60%, your retirement distribution tool matters more than your comprehensive planning tool.

  2. What planning modules do you actually use? Most advisors use 30-40% of their platform’s features. Do not pay for estate planning, insurance analysis, and education planning modules you open twice a year.

  3. What integrations are non-negotiable? CRM sync, custodial data feeds, and account aggregation requirements will narrow your options quickly.

  4. How important is the client portal? If your clients actively use their portal, the portal experience will drive your decision more than the planning engine.

  5. What is your budget? Switching is a good time to right-size your spending. You may find that a retirement planning platform at $199-299/month does more for your retirement clients than a comprehensive platform at $379/month.

Evaluation criteria that matter

  • Satisfaction scores from actual advisors (T3 survey, Kitces Report). These are peer reviews, not vendor marketing.
  • Product development velocity. How often does the platform ship meaningful updates? Check their blog or changelog.
  • Support responsiveness. Trial the support experience before you commit. Submit a question and time the response.
  • Migration support. Does the vendor help you move data, or do you start from scratch?
  • Contract terms. Avoid long lock-ins if possible. Monthly billing lets you leave if the product disappoints.

The Major Alternatives Compared

MoneyGuidePro (current) RightCapital eMoney Advisor Income Lab
Primary focus Comprehensive planning Comprehensive planning Comprehensive planning Retirement planning platform
T3 2026 satisfaction 7.62/10 8.40/10 8.14/10 Rated #1 in retirement distribution
Kitces 2025 satisfaction 7.9/10 8.7/10 8.5/10 8.7/10
T3 2026 market share 24.23% 21.37% 35.62% (#1) #1 ret. distribution, 3 years running
Market share trend Declining Growing rapidly Stable Growing
Entry price (monthly) ~$175/mo ~$150/mo ~$250-300/mo $199/mo (Core)
Full platform price ~$258/mo + add-ons ~$255/mo ~$379/mo $299/mo (Pro)
Contract Annual Annual (first year) 12-month Monthly or annual
Guardrails methodology No (Monte Carlo only) Basic guardrails module No (Monte Carlo only) Yes (core product)
Tax planning depth Basic Tax Analyzer (OCR) Deep built-in Tax Lab (Roth, IRMAA, withdrawal sequencing)
Social Security Built-in Built-in (7.96 T3) Built-in Dedicated (8.60 T3)
AI features Insights AI, Dash Smart Import CoPlanner Penny, Plan Builder, Scribe
Client portal MyBlocks, Dash Full portal + mobile app Decision Center Life Hub
Account aggregation MX/Yodlee add-on ($400/yr) Built-in Built-in Via integrations
Support rating (Kitces) 7.8/10 9.1/10 8.2/10 N/A
Best for Enterprise/BD (installed base) Independent RIAs, generalists Complex planning, enterprise Retirement-focused practices

Pricing as of March 2026. Sources: T3/Inside Information 2026 Survey, Kitces 2025 AdvisorTech Report, vendor websites.

RightCapital: The Momentum Pick

RightCapital is where most MoneyGuidePro defectors are going. The T3 data makes this explicit: RightCapital grew from 3.39% market share in 2018 to 21.37% in 2026, and MoneyGuidePro’s loss is RightCapital’s primary gain.

Why advisors choose it:
– Best overall value: more features at a lower price point than MoneyGuide or eMoney
– 8.40/10 T3 satisfaction (highest among the major comprehensive planning platforms)
– 9.1/10 support score in Kitces (highest in the industry)
– Regular feature updates (quarterly product releases)
– Building a dedicated MoneyGuide migration tool to make switching easier
– Smoothest transition since RightCapital’s approach is very similar to MoneyGuide’s, meaning it is more of a “Toyota to Honda” swap than a real change in approach

Potential concerns:
– Younger platform (founded 2015), less enterprise infrastructure than eMoney
– Estate planning module is less deep than eMoney’s
– Skews toward smaller, newer firms; less penetration among 20+ year practices
– Guardrails and dynamic spending features are add-ons, not the core engine

RightCapital is the strongest choice for advisors who want a direct MoneyGuidePro replacement: comprehensive planning, modern interface, and a team that ships features.

eMoney Advisor: The Depth Pick

eMoney is the most comprehensive planning platform on the market, with 35.62% market share. If your reason for leaving MoneyGuidePro is that it lacks planning depth (not that it costs too much or feels outdated), eMoney is the upgrade.

Why advisors choose it:
– Deepest cash-flow projection and planning engine available
– Trust distributions, charitable vehicles, stock options, multi-state tax
– Built-in account aggregation and Decision Center client portal
– Fidelity backing (resources, stability, preferential pricing for Fidelity custody)
– CoPlanner AI reduces plan-building time by 48%

Potential concerns:
– $379/month (mid-tier) is more than double MoneyGuidePro’s base
– 12-month contract commitment
– Steeper learning curve (users report 3-6 months to full proficiency)
– Complexity means many features go unused in smaller practices
– Contract enforcement reputation generates some advisor frustration

eMoney makes sense for advisors moving to a larger firm, serving more complex clients, or needing enterprise-grade infrastructure.

Income Lab: The Retirement Platform Pick

Income Lab is a full retirement planning platform built around the question retirement clients actually ask: how much can I spend? It covers plan building, guardrails-based income planning, Tax Lab for Roth conversions and withdrawal sequencing, Social Security optimization, annuity modeling, and the Life Hub client portal, with Penny answering Roth conversion, IRMAA, and Social Security questions during client meetings. For retirement-focused practices, it is a primary alternative to MoneyGuidePro, not a niche add-on.

Why advisors choose it:
– #1-rated retirement distribution planning tool in the T3 survey, three years running, and a 3x T3 All-Star
– 8.7/10 advisor satisfaction (Kitces 2025)
– Risk-based guardrails methodology (specific spending amounts with adjustment rules, not just probability)
– Tax-optimized withdrawal sequencing (year-by-year, IRMAA-aware, bracket-managed)
– Social Security optimization rated 8.60 in T3 (highest in category)
– Core at $199/month and Pro at $299/month, with a 14-day free trial

Potential concerns:
– No life, disability, or long-term-care insurance modeling and no dedicated education planning module; estate analysis runs through Penny rather than a dedicated document workflow
– Accumulation planning coverage is growing but is not the platform’s center of gravity
– Smaller overall market share than the comprehensive incumbents, though #1 in retirement distribution three years running
– Client portal (Life Hub) is focused on retirement, not full financial planning

Income Lab makes sense for advisors whose practice centers on retirement income. If 60%+ of your planning time is spent on distribution strategies, withdrawal sequencing, and the “how much can I spend” conversation, Income Lab can be your primary platform, covering that work at greater depth than MoneyGuidePro and at a comparable price. You can keep MoneyGuidePro running during the transition, with nothing to cancel on day one. Income Lab Pro also includes Penny, which answers Roth conversion, IRMAA, and Social Security questions live in client meetings. For a look at how AI paraplanner tools are reshaping advisory workflows, see our AI paraplanner guide for financial advisors.

Advisor takeaway: The right path depends on why you are leaving. Leaving because MoneyGuide feels outdated and you want a modern comprehensive platform? RightCapital. Leaving because you need deeper planning for complex clients? eMoney. Leaving because your practice is retirement-focused and MoneyGuide’s Monte Carlo approach limits your client conversations? Income Lab as your primary platform, with MoneyGuidePro running only through the transition.

Considering the switch?

The fastest way to see whether Income Lab fits your practice is a 30-minute walkthrough using one of your existing MoneyGuidePro client scenarios. We will show you the same plan side-by-side and answer your migration questions.

Book a switch walkthrough →

Other Options Worth Considering

Holistiplan (tax planning specialist)

If your primary frustration with MoneyGuidePro is tax planning, Holistiplan’s OCR-powered tax return scanning (8.86/10 T3 satisfaction, the tax category leader) may solve your problem without replacing your entire planning platform. It is a tax specialist overlay, not a MoneyGuidePro replacement.

Note: Holistiplan nearly doubled its pricing in 2025, which created competitive openings for alternatives.

Orion Planning (all-in-one platform)

For advisors already in the Orion ecosystem (portfolio management, performance reporting), Orion’s planning module adds financial planning without a second vendor. The planning module is lighter than standalone platforms, but the integrated portfolio + planning workflow has value for Orion-committed firms.

NaviPlan (avoid)

NaviPlan’s T3 satisfaction score is 5.80/10, the lowest among rated planning platforms. Its market share is 1.17% and declining. Unless you have a specific institutional requirement for NaviPlan, it is not a viable MoneyGuidePro replacement.

The Switching Checklist

Migration from MoneyGuidePro to any new platform requires planning. Use this checklist to minimize disruption.

Before you switch

  • [ ] Audit your current usage. Which MoneyGuide features do you actually use weekly? Which have you not opened in 6 months? This determines whether you need a like-for-like comprehensive platform or a retirement planning platform that goes deeper on the work you actually do.
  • [ ] Export client data. Download all plan summaries, reports, and client-facing documents from MoneyGuide. Most platforms do not import MoneyGuide plan files directly.
  • [ ] Check your contract. Verify your renewal date and cancellation terms. Some Envestnet contracts auto-renew with 30-day notice requirements.
  • [ ] Trial 2-3 alternatives. Run the same client scenario through each platform. Use a real client case (anonymized if needed) with complexity that matches your typical workload.
  • [ ] Test integrations. Connect your CRM and custodial data feeds during the trial. Integration problems are the #1 post-migration frustration.
  • [ ] Budget for overlap. Plan to run both platforms simultaneously for 60-90 days. Cutting over cold creates unnecessary risk.

During migration (first 60 days)

  • [ ] Prioritize your top 20 clients. Rebuild plans for your highest-value relationships first. Do not try to migrate all clients at once.
  • [ ] Recreate your standard scenarios. Build your most common plan templates (single retiree, married couple with pension, Roth conversion candidate) in the new platform so you are not starting from scratch for each client.
  • [ ] Run parallel plans. For the first 10-15 client meetings, run the new tool alongside MoneyGuide. Compare outputs. Identify where the new platform produces different results and understand why.
  • [ ] Document workarounds. Every platform has gaps. Note which MoneyGuide features you miss and whether the new tool has a workaround, a different approach, or a genuine gap.
  • [ ] Train your team. If you have associates or paraplanners, schedule dedicated training time. Platform migration fails when only one person knows the new tool.

After migration (days 60-90)

  • [ ] Cancel MoneyGuidePro. Confirm in writing. Keep documentation of your cancellation for contract disputes.
  • [ ] Update your ADV. If your Form ADV Part 2A references specific planning software, update it.
  • [ ] Notify clients if needed. If the client portal experience changes (new login, different interface), communicate proactively. A short email is sufficient.
  • [ ] Collect team feedback. After 90 days, survey your team: What’s better? What’s worse? What’s missing? This informs whether you need additional overlay tools.

Client Scenarios

Scenario 1: Generalist practice, straightforward migration

Lakewood Financial has three advisors and 250 client households across all life stages. They use MoneyGuidePro for everything: accumulation projections, retirement planning, basic estate, and insurance needs analysis. Their primary frustration is the interface and slow feature updates.

Recommended path: RightCapital. This is the closest 1:1 replacement. RightCapital covers all the same planning modules, has a modern interface, ships features faster, and costs less. The 14-day trial lets them verify that their workflow translates. RightCapital is also building a dedicated MoneyGuide migration tool, which may further simplify the data transition. Budget 60 days of overlap and start with the top 30 client plans.

Scenario 2: Retirement-focused practice, rethinking the stack

Catherine runs a solo practice with 55 retirement-focused households. She uses MoneyGuidePro primarily for retirement projections and Social Security analysis. She has never opened the estate planning or education modules. Her clients ask about spending levels, Roth conversion timing, and what to do when markets drop. MoneyGuide’s probability-of-success output leaves her clients with vague answers.

Recommended path: Income Lab as the primary platform. Income Lab covers the planning work Catherine does daily, with deeper methodology: guardrails-based spending, Roth conversion timing through Tax Lab, Social Security optimization, and the Life Hub client portal. At $199-299/month it costs about the same as MoneyGuidePro’s $258/month platform bundle, with significantly better capabilities for her actual workload. She can keep MoneyGuidePro running through the 60-90 day transition, with nothing to cancel on day one.

See How Guardrails-Based Planning Works

If you’re evaluating Income Lab as part of your post-MoneyGuidePro stack, this walkthrough shows how tax-smart distribution planning works in practice, including Roth conversion analysis, withdrawal sequencing, and client-ready output.

The Bottom Line

MoneyGuidePro held the #1 position in financial planning software for 17 consecutive years. That streak is over. The platform’s satisfaction scores are the lowest among major competitors, its market share is declining at an accelerating rate, and advisors are voting with their wallets.

If you are considering a switch, the good news is that the alternatives are strong. RightCapital offers a modern, comprehensive replacement at a lower price. eMoney offers unmatched depth for complex planning needs. Income Lab offers a full retirement planning platform for practices focused on the decumulation conversation.

The market is moving. More advisors switched planning platforms in the last two years than in the previous five combined. If your current tool is holding your practice back, the switching costs are real but manageable with proper planning.

Sources

Continue Reading

Ready to See What’s Possible?

Try Income Lab. Start with a 14-day free trial with full Pro access. Build a plan for one of your retirement clients and see how guardrails-based distribution planning compares to MoneyGuidePro’s probability-of-success approach.

Start Your Trial

Book a walkthrough. See how Income Lab handles the retirement income conversation differently.

Book a Walkthrough

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are advisors leaving MoneyGuidePro?

The exodus is driven by several factors: a buggy 2023 upgrade that Envestnet had to recall, stagnant product development (lowest satisfaction score among major platforms at 7.62/10 in the T3 2026 survey), declining support responsiveness (7.8/10 in Kitces vs. RightCapital’s 9.1), and pricing that is hard to justify against more modern alternatives. MoneyGuidePro’s market share dropped from 33% in 2024 to 24.23% in 2026, and it lost the #1 position it had held for 17 consecutive years.

What is the best alternative to MoneyGuidePro?

It depends on why you’re leaving. For a direct comprehensive replacement with a modern interface and lower price, RightCapital is the strongest choice (8.40/10 T3 satisfaction, $150-255/month). For deeper planning on complex clients, eMoney Advisor offers unmatched breadth ($250-379/month). For retirement-focused practices where distribution planning is the priority, Income Lab is a full retirement planning platform with guardrails methodology at its core, at $199-299/month, and a primary alternative in its own right.

How long does it take to switch from MoneyGuidePro?

Plan for 60-90 days of overlap. Start by rebuilding plans for your top 20 clients in the new platform. Run parallel plans for the first 10-15 client meetings to compare outputs and understand differences. Most advisors reach full proficiency in 30-60 days with a focused migration approach. The key is not trying to migrate all clients at once.

Can Income Lab be my primary platform after MoneyGuidePro?

For retirement-focused practices, yes. Income Lab is a full retirement planning platform: plan building, guardrails-based income planning, Tax Lab for Roth conversions and withdrawal sequencing, Social Security optimization, annuity modeling, and the Life Hub client portal, with Penny answering Roth conversion, IRMAA, and Social Security questions in client meetings. Honest gaps: no life, disability, or long-term-care insurance modeling and no dedicated education planning module, and estate analysis runs through Penny. For advisors where 60%+ of planning time is spent on distribution strategies and the ‘how much can I spend’ conversation, Income Lab works as the primary platform, with MoneyGuidePro running only during the transition.

What should I check before switching planning software?

Audit your actual usage first: which features do you use weekly vs. which you haven’t opened in 6 months. Then evaluate non-negotiable integrations (CRM, custodial data feeds, account aggregation), test 2-3 alternatives with a real client scenario, trial the support experience, and check your contract for auto-renewal terms. Budget for 60-90 days of running both platforms simultaneously.

Justin Fitzpatrick, PhD, CFA, CFP - President and Co-Founder of Income Lab
Justin Fitzpatrick, PhD, CFA, CFP

Justin Fitzpatrick is President and Co-Founder of Income Lab, retirement income planning software used by thousands of financial advisors. He developed the guardrails-based approach to retirement income distribution after a decade in financial services at Jackson and seven years in academia at MIT, Harvard, and UCLA. His research on adjustment-based planning has been published on Kitces.com, ThinkAdvisor, AdvisorPerspectives, and FinancialPlanning Magazine.

View all articles by Justin LinkedIn

Continue Reading

Retirement Paycheck: What It Is and How Advisors Build One → Income Lab vs. T. Rowe Price Income Solver: An Honest Comparison for Financial Advisors → Income Lab vs. RightCapital: An Honest Comparison for Financial Advisors → Risk-Based Guardrails vs Guyton-Klinger: An Advisor's Decision Guide →

Ready to see this in action?

Watch how Income Lab helps advisors answer clients' toughest retirement income questions with guardrails-based planning.

Book a Walkthrough Start Free Trial